Lab 3: Unsupervised Classification

Goal
The main goal of this lab is to understand the art of extracting biophysical and sociocultural information from remotely sensed images, utilizing unsupervised classification algorithm. First in the lab we will become familiar with understanding the input configuration requirements and execution of an unsupervised classifier. Then the art of recoding multiple spectral clusters generated from unsupervised classifiers into thematic informational land use and land cover classes that meet a classification scheme.
Methods
Part 1: Experimenting with unsupervised ISODATA classification algorithm  
Section 1: Setting up an unsupervised classification algorithm  

In part one of the lab, we will  be experimenting with unsupervised ISODATA classification algorithm. First off, an Eau claire and Chippewa Image was formated to an unsupervised classification, utilizing an ISODATA algorithm.

Figure 1: Classification scheme utilized when performing the ISODATA unsupervised classification.

Section 2: Labeling of unsupervised clusters into meaningful land use/land cover classes 
Once this image was produced, then the image was synced to a google Earth viewer so the clusters of data could be categorized into the 5 classifications showed in figure 1.When these classifications were applied after determining what the surface feature was, the attribute is as follows in Figure 2.


Figure 2: This attribute table is what i classified each cluster to be. based on analyzing different values.

Part 2: Improving the accuracy of unsupervised classification
Section 1: Setting up and running an unsupervised classification algorithm  
In the second part of this lab, the same process was performed as in part 1 section 1 with the Eau Chipp2000 image. However the maximum number of classes this time is 20 rather than 10. The convergence threshold this time was lowered to 0.92 from 0.95. This threshold is the lowest number of pixel values that are considered within each classification.  The output image (Eau_Chipp2000usp2.img) now has 20 clusters of data in the attribute table (Figure 3). This data will be classified and renamed to fall under one of the 5 categories mentioned above in part 1. Figure 4 shows the classification of the 20 new classes.

Figure 3: This attribute table shows the new ISODATA classification with 20 clusters, and 0.92 threshold.

Results
Part 1: Experimenting with unsupervised ISODATA classification algorithm  
In part one, Figure 4 shows the result of performing unsupervised ISODATA classification. This classification is not very accurate. The green color represents forest, however there's not that much forest in the Eau Claire and Chippewa Counties. additionally faulty classifications are seen in all classes, agriculture especially because the Eau Claire Airport Runway is considered to be Agricultural land and not urban. This is problematic because classification maps should be more accurate.
Figure 4: This image shows the ISODATA classification scheme with 20 classes symbolized as 5.
Part 2: Improving the accuracy of unsupervised classification
In part 2 when the LULC classification grouped the 20 cluster into 5 classes, the final output is shown in Figure 5. This improvement of the unsupervised classification is slightly more accurate i believe, except there is to much user input to know if the user was correct in naming each class. 


Figure 5: This map shows 20 classes clustered into 5 to show a slightly more accurate classification.
Sources

Landsat satellite image is from Earth Resources Observation and Science Center, United States Geological Survey. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lab 6: Digital Change Detection

Lab 5: classification Accuracy Assessment

Lab 10: Radar Remote Sensing